generalisation-20
刘耀文的大沙雕
钟意阿满
求助英语翻译，急急急！！！谢谢
Pythagoras 毕达哥拉斯 。
参阅下面的网页.
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Pythagoras.html。
抱起亚轩找小葵
英语翻译(计算机相关英语)
总的来说，我们的方法产生的运行结果。
水动画可比看到这些真实
具有可接受的速度中的视频动画
和质量。主要的新想法是步骤
一代绘画结构基于流动方差
地图和中国画笔位置。
不过，我们的方法，目前有一些局限，
我们打算在未来的解决
工作。
我们的方法来安排行程很简单，
即使合理有效。地方统计
水流用于地方中风，但更
复杂的规则可以使用。例如，
一个艺术家向我们表示，中风可能。
制定不同的流量在不同地区，
如顶部和瀑布的中间，
可能会得出不同的根据速度
的流动，以及它的方向。其中一个方法。
这将是存储在模板中招，
并让用户只需说明哪些招
使用该模板在不同的区域
瀑布，或招用在水
正以不同的速度。这种做法
便需要进行详细调查，以实现
最好的效果，同时考虑到艺术和科学。
方面的问题。
还有的范围，以取代相机的动作
源视频的一个新的，用户定义的相机。
议案。在所有框架的背景是灌装
简单，但时空合成未入帐
瀑布的地区将需要
在一个精神概括类似中风
视频纹理[20]。这种方法也可以。
用于概括水流较长，或
甚至无穷，动画。这样的扩展会
允许通过动画更大的编辑控制权
生产，甚至到了观赏瀑布的程度
在一个完全不同的方式，在它所
原来拍摄。
大圣杰锅是
求love is a fallacy 的英文概述500字要求原创啊 高分啊早上六点发给我噢 1125037801@qq.com
2相关工作
很多做了大量的工作，以改善性能 。
内存子系统。在地址precomputing [ 18 ] ，一些 。
指示正在preexecuted为了计算 。
负载地址较早。预计划可归纳
到软件为基础的[ 19 ， 20 ] ，基于硬件的和 。
杂交的方法[ 21 ] 。一个例子，基于硬件的 。
方法是运行之前执行[ 22 ] 。
基于硬件的方法往往预测未来
行为的程序根据其过去的行为。
在硬件为基础的方法，以预测快取 。
怀念，预测坐在里面的处理器之间，或 。
L1数据缓存和二级缓存之间的L2缓存和 。
主记忆体。一些基于硬件的方法 。
[ 23 ]预测业务，生产地址 。
所使用的负载指示。但是，其中大多数是重点 。
预测本身的地址。
规律的一个重要类别的工作量。
序贯行为[ 6 ]是最简单的情况。跨越 。
行为是一个概括的顺序行为。
访问序列已大步行为如果距离
之间连续地址保持不变。
捕捉大步行为提出了贝尔和
陈[ 13 ， 14 ]和富和帕特尔[ 16 ] 。既实现 。
添加硬件模块内的处理器。此模块 。
显示器处理器序列的访问，并确定 。
流的方式加载指示。每当
预测是，请求被发送到缓存。如果错过 。
高速缓存中，它是提取下一级memoryhierarchy 。三种不同的作品[ 7 ， 10 ， 11 ]提出了 。
思想与行为迈出的想法流缓冲器。在 。
此外，还有两个其他作品[ 15 ， 17 ]利用跨步行为 。
预测负荷的行为的指示。
影子目录预取[ 2 ] ，微量图[ 5 ] 。
马尔可夫prefetcher [ 3 ]重点查明不规则 。
访问模式。距离预取[ 4 ]的方法 。
所使用范围内的转换后备缓冲器 。
（你们）预取，但它能够被利用预取 。
缓存块以及。罗斯等。 [ 9 ]确定对 。
指示，负载和消费价值的一个指针 。
为了预测行为的指针密集型代码。
最后，奥尔特加等人。 [ 8 ]一概而论这一想法找到 。
的指示，即生产的讲话是后来
所使用的负载指示。
小韩在追星
Love is a Fallacy – A Recap。
A university student of law studies wanted to find a smart, graceful and beautiful girl as his partner. He traded his roommate with a raccoon coat in exchange of dating his roommate’s girlfriend. The student found that the girl was graceful and beautiful, but she was not smart enough, so he decided to train her with logical thinking before beginning formal dating. 。
In the first five days, the student taught her with some common fallacies of logic. 。
- Dicto Simpliciter: “Doing sports is good so everyone should do sports”. This proposition was not conclusive when the subjects are people with heart conditions.。
- Hasty Generalisation: “You cannot speak French; neither is your friend; therefore there is no one in the university who can”. It had too little evidence to support the statement.。
- Post Hoc: “Do not bring him to picnic, because if you do it will rain”. The cause of action was not correct. 。
- Contradictory Premises: “The omnipotent God can create a rock that God cannot lift”. It was not arguable when the premises are conflicting against each other.。
- Ad Misericordiam: “The candidate responded to the question asking about his ability to work with nothing but listing his miseries”. Unmatched responses were not constructive. 。
- False Analogy: “Because surgeons refer to X-ray during operation, so students should refer to books during exams”. The comparison was falsely interpreted. 。
- Hypothesis Contrary to Fact: “Without Madam Curie, no one will discover radium”. The assumed fact cannot initiate a strong argument.。
- Poisoning the Well: People cannot start a rational argument by calling the opponent a liar.。
After the training of common logic, the student tried to court to the girl, but the girl seemed logically enlightened, and logically rejected the student by proving his words were fallacies.。
- the student said they were meant to be together, the girl believed it was Hasty Generalisation, because they only dated for 5 days.。
- the student argued that 5 days were sufficient, because people do not need to finish a cake before knowing the cake was delicious. The girl believed it was False Analogy, as she was not a cake but a girl.。
- the student said he loved the girl; without her his life would have no meaning. The girl responded by identifying it as an Ad Misericordiam, as he was appealing by demonstrating misery. 。
- the student then said, the girl would not identify his words to be fallacies without his training. The girl said it was Hypothesis Contrary to Fact, because it was an assumed fact.。
- the student said it was only a training of logic, and it was not life. The girl said it was a Dicto Simpliciter.。
- when the student learnt that the girl had agreed to date his roommate, he called his roommate a liar; the girl immediate pointed out it was Poisoning the Well.。
At last, the student asked for a logical reason of the girl’s choice, and the girl said it was because the roommate owned a raccoon coat, which the student himself gave it to the roommate.。
523字 简要概述这个故事 原创 如果字数超出 可以做小部分删减 如果满意 请采纳。
小韩在追星