rebutting

救救孩子的英语吧？

反驳英文：Contradict。

单词发音：英 [ˌkɒntrəˈdɪkt] 美 [,kɑntrə'dɪkt]。

短语搭配：

contradict t 反驳 ; 顶嘴 ; 否认 ; 与…矛盾。

Goes Contradict 也反驳。

contradict sb 反驳某人。

双语例句：

Very well then, I contradict myself. 很好，那么我就是要自相矛盾。

This is contradict. Government is not stupid like that. 这是一对矛盾的，政府不会那么愚蠢。

And all the disbelief in the world can't contradict that piece of evidence. 而在这个世界上的一切怀疑都不能否定那件证据。

有关反驳英语怎么说的例句1：

她反驳我，说我才应该受责备。

She retorted upon me, saying I was to blame.。

科学家们提出了有力论据反驳他的观点。

Scientists have produced powerful arguments against his ideas.。

他讲演的大部分时间都在反驳对他外交政策的批评。

He spent most of his speech rebutting criticisms of his foreign policy.。

她不敢反驳他。

She dared not contradict him。

他准备全面反驳共和党人对他严重的指控。

He prepared a complete refutation of the Republicans 'most serious charges.。

他正在对前同事的指责进行逐条反驳。

He is conducting a point-by-point rebuttal of charges from former colleagues。

总理反驳说他对自己所收到的那些建议颇为顾虑。

英语英语英语英语？

save the children、Save Our Children、Heal the Kids。

save，英文单词，介词、名词，及物动词、不及物动词，作介词时意为“除...之外”，作名词时意为“救援，人名；(法)萨夫；(意、保、西、罗、塞、瑞典)萨薇 (女名)，萨韦”，作及物动词时意为“节省；保存；储蓄；解救”，作不及物动词时意为“节省；挽救”。

双语例句：

1、So I should save my money.。

所以我应该节约我的钱。

2、What should we do to save the earth ?。

我们应该做什么来拯救地球呢？

3、Daniel: Do you have the workers to save me if anything should happen?。

丹尼尔: 如果发生什么情况，你们会有工作人员来救我吗？

英语翻译，求助高手

to sleep,have been soaring,relasation,Growth5.to6.that7.to scare8.that9.scwntific10.have overlooked。

英语大神求求了？

我认为，生产电钻的厂家对MIKE犯了疏忽大意侵权，首先，生产电钻的厂家对购买电钻的消费者负有谨慎爱护之责，这是要件之一，生产厂家，明知道这批电钻大约有5%质量有问题，电路会融化，会导致购买者受到电击，却不回收修理或者提醒购买者，这就违背了谨慎爱护之责，是要件之二。而消费者MIKE，因此受到了电击和摔伤等严重的伤害，这就是要件之三。所以，在此次事件中，三个要件全都符合，所以，MIKE可以以民事侵权的疏忽大意来起诉这家电钻公司。

I think that the manufacturers of drills commit a tort of negligence. First of all, the producers of drills has the duty of care to the consumer who purchases the product., this is one element, on the other hand ,Producers who know there are 5% of the drills have some problems of quality that is to say the circuit will melt and it will lead to electric shocks of the purchasers do not repair or recovery the product ,neither remind the purchaser. This is the second element that it has the breach of duty of care. At last, consumer MIKE had been shocked and serious injury which is the third element. Therefore, in this case, three elements are meeting and MIKE can be prosecuted for negligence of this appliance drilling company. 。

生产厂家，对MIKE附有谨慎爱护之责吗？我们可以从两个方面来考虑，首先，合理的可预见性，生产厂家明知道自己的产品有问题会导致事故的发生，却不回收和修补，从而导致了MIKE受了很严重的伤害，这是可以预见的，其次是亲近性（proximity）

Dose the manufacturer has the duty of care to Mike? We can see from these two aspects to consider, first of all, a reasonable foreseeability that the manufacturers know their products have problems and will lead to accidents but without recoverying and repairing, resulting in the serious injury of Mike, which is expected, followed by proximity. 。

而生产厂家应该对FRED的损失做出赔偿吗？很显然，我认为是的，因为FRED所受的损失是纯经济损失（pure economic loss)而寻求赔偿其纯经济损失的第三方需要满足一些前提条件：因为生产厂家，明知道这批电钻大约有5%质量有问题，电路会融化，会导致购买者受到电击，却不回收修理或者提醒购买者，就应该会预想到这批产品会导致事故，从而给消费者带来事故，可能会影响很大地方，所以，我认为这是可以预见的，第二点是所受到的纯经济损失具有亲近性（proximity），我认为，生产厂家的过失，导致了MIKE的遭受 电击，从而影响了FRED的工作，所以，我认为这之间是有因果联系的，是因果关系的亲近，所以，这两点全都符合，所以厂家应该对FRED的损失给与适当赔偿。

Did the manufacturers make compensation for the loss of FRED? Obviously, I think it is, because the loss FRED suffered is pure economic loss and the third-party who seeking compensation for pure economic loss need to meet some of the prerequisite conditions: ,Producers who know there are 5% of the drills have some problems of quality that is to say the circuit will melt and it will lead to electric shocks of the purchasers do not repair or recovery the product ,neither remind the purchaser, it should be expected that these products will lead to accidents, thus it will bring accidents to consumers which may affect the great place, so I think this is foreseeable, the second point is that the pure economic loss has the proximity, I believe that the fault of the manufacturer, resulting in the suffering of MIKE of electric shocks which affected the work of FRED, I think that there is a causal link between them and it is the proximity. Therefore, manufacturers should give appropriate compensation to FRED in the case that the two aspects all meet . 。

而MIKE应该对Fred的损失做出赔偿吗?我认为这是不用的，因为MIKE在本身的操作上没有失误，是因为产品质量原因造成的事故，而导致Fred的工作受到了影响，造成了经济上的损失，这是不可预见的。所以MIKE 不应该对FRED 承担责任。

so because MIKE himself did not has a failure of the operation , it is because the quality of the products that caused the accident, which led to the affection of Fred's work, resulting in the economic loss, which is unpredictable .So MIKE should not be held responsible for FRED. 。

厂家可以有什么理由辩解吗？我认为没有，因为疏忽大意的抗辩有两个条件： 一 原告自己也有粗心大意，二 原告自愿承担了风险，这二者此案例中都没有，所以这个公司应承担全部责任，没有什么辩解的。

Is there any reasons manufacturers can justify it? I do not think so, because there are two conditions of the negligence defense: a plaintiff also has its own carelessness, the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk, which in this case the two are not, so the company should take full responsibility, there is no excuse.。

疏忽的行为必须造成损失，这是证明有疏忽大意民事侵权存在的第三个要素。首先要考虑的事，损失是否由于被告疏忽大意引起的。这就是因果关系的因素。要问的就是“原告所遭受到得损失是因为被告违背了其谨慎爱护责任引起的吗？”第二个要考虑的是损失不能太遥远，太间接。只有可预见的损失能够得到补偿。

It is the third factor to prove the existence of civil tort carelessness if the careless behaviors which has a damage. First thing to consider is whether the loss caused by defendant’s carelessness. This is the causal relationship between factors. Which has to ask is that "did the loss the plaintiff suffered is due to the breach of duty of care caused by defendant?” The second to consider is the loss can not too far nor indirect. Only foreseeable loss can be compensated.。

纯手工翻译，可能有错，但比软件翻得强，那个没有语法的。

you must pay a great price for ＿ him the secret中间填什么啊！

这应该是高中三年级的英语练习题，答案如下：

1, to sleep 2, have soared 3, relaxation 4, growing 5, to 6, that 7, to scare 8, if 9, scientific 10, are overlooking 。

若还有疑问，欢迎追问。

原文地址：http://www.qianchusai.com/rebutting.html