informality用法

英语中表示否定的前缀in-和un-分别用在什么场合？

informality

读法：

英 [ˌɪnfɔːˈmæləti]  美 [ˌɪnfɔːrˈmæləti]。

解释：

n. 非正式；不拘礼节

用法：

urban Informality 城市非正规性 ; 非正式。

We encourage informality 我们崇尚以和为贵。

Damascus urban informality 大马士革。

扩展资料：

近义词：

formal

读法：英 [ˈfɔːml]  美 [ˈfɔːrml]。

解释：

adj. 正式的；拘谨的；有条理的。

n. 正式的社交活动；夜礼服

n. (Formal)人名；(法)福马尔。

用法：

formal language 正式语言 ; 正式用语。

formal grammar [数] 形式文法 ; 形式语法。

formal dress 礼服 ; 号衣 ; 正式服装 ; 大礼服。

relative这个英语单词怎么造句

前缀in-为拉丁前缀，一般与拉丁借词相结合，拉丁借词词尾多为拉丁后缀如-ate，-ent等。in-常加在形容词，名词之前，如incorrect不正确的、inability无能 无力、inaccurate不准确的等。

un-主要放于名词，形容词，副词前面，常见的例子有unfinished未完成的、undoubted无疑的、unemployment失业。

扩展资料：

词根、前缀、后缀、英语词根都属于英语单词构成要素，是词的核心部分。单词的意义主要也是由它体现出来的。英文中一个英语单词可以分为三个部分：前缀（prefix），词根（stem）及后缀（suffix）。单词中位于词根前面的部分就是前缀。前缀，可以改变单词的意思。

语中有不少否定前缀可以和名词、动词或形容词等搭配，组成带有否定含义的词语。比如 “un-、in-、im-、il-、dis-、dys-” 等。

who的所有中文解释

1、 Get a relative to look after the children。

找个亲戚来照看这些孩子。

2、 The fighting resumed after a period of relative calm。

战斗在一段相对的平静之后重新开始。

3、They chatted about the relative merits of London and Paris as places to live。

他们闲聊伦敦与巴黎作为居住地各自相对的优点。

4、 Japanese interest rates rose relative to America。

日本的利率与美国相比有所上升。

5、 Fitness is relative； one must always ask ＂Fit for what？＂。

适宜是相对的；始终必须问问：“适宜什么？”

扩展资料

relative近义词：opposite。

发音：英 ［ˈɒpəzɪt； ˈɒpəsɪt］  美 ［ˈɑːpəzɪt］。

释义：

adj． 相反的；对面的；对立的。

n． 对立面；反义词

prep． 在…的对面

adv． 在对面

opposite用法

1、opposite用作副词时意思是“在对面”，在句中多用作状语。

2、opposite可指空间位置上的“对面的”，也可指两件东西被认为位于一直线的两端，在地位、性质、意义等方面“对立”或“相反”。

3、opposite用作定语时，主要指空间位置上的关系，作“对面的”解，可前置，也可后置。前置时表示一对相对的物体或事物中的一个，两者有相互依存的关系，这种关系是客观的，永久的；而后置时则表示暂时的空间关系或在讲话人或被谈论的人的对面。opposite作“相反的”解时可作前置定语，也可作表语。

4、opposite作形容词表示“对面的”时，后常加介词to，不过句子中的to常被省略。

各国送礼的习俗。用英语

who

[hu:]

pron.

谁, 那...的(人)

WHO

abbr.

世界卫生组织

who

who

AHD:[h›]

D.J.[hu8]

K.K.[hu]

pron.（代词）

What or which person or persons:。

谁：什么人、哪个人或哪些人：

Who left?

谁离开了?

Used as a relative pronoun to introduce a clause when the antecedent is a person or persons or one to whom personality is attributed:。

谁：当先行词是一个或多个人或是被赋与身份的一个人时，用作关系代词来引导从句：

the visitor who came yesterday; our child, who is gifted; informed sources who denied the story.。

昨天来拜访的那个人；我们天赋异禀的孩子；告诉那些不相信的人这个故事的来源。

The person or persons that; whoever:。

谁：人或人们；不管什么人：

Who believes that will believe anything.。

相信那个的人会相信任何事

Middle English 。

中古英语

from Old English hw³} * see k wo- 。

源自 古英语 hw³} *参见 k wo- 。

The traditional rules that determine the use ofwho and whom are relatively simple: who is used for a grammatical subject, where a nominative pronoun such as I or he would be appropriate, andwhom is used elsewhere. Thus, we writeThe actor who played Hamlet was there, sincewho stands for the subject of played Hamlet; andWho do you think is the best candidate? where who stands for the subject of is the best candidate. But we writeTo whom did you give the letter? sincewhom is the object of the preposition to; andThe man whom the papers criticized did not show up, sincewhom is the object of the verb criticized. ? Considerable effort and attention are required to apply the rules correctly in complicated sentences.To produce correctly a sentence such asI met the man whom the government had tried to get France to extradite, we must anticipate when we writewhom that it will function as the object of the verb extradite, several clauses distant from it.It is thus not surprising that writers from Shakespeare onward should often have interchangedwho and whom. And though the distinction shows no signs of disappearing in formal style,strict adherence to the rules in informal discourse might be taken as evidence that the speaker or writer is paying undue attention to the form of what is said, possibly at the expense of its substance.In speech and informal writingwho tends to predominate over whom; a sentence such asWho did John say he was going to support? will be regarded as quite natural, if strictly incorrect. By contrast, the use ofwhom where who would be required, as inWhom shall I say is calling? may be thought to betray a certain linguistic insecurity. ? When the relative pronoun stands for the object of a preposition that ends a sentence,whom is technically the correct form: the strict grammarian will insist onWhom (not who ) did you give it to? But grammarians since Noah Webster have argued that the excessive formality ofwhom in these cases is at odds with the relative informality associated with the practice of placing the preposition in final position and that the use of who in these cases should be regarded as entirely acceptable. ? The relative pronounwho may be used in restrictive relative clauses, in which case it is not preceded by a comma, or in nonrestrictive clauses, in which case a comma is required.Thus, we may say eitherThe scientist who discovers a cure for cancer will be immortalized, where the clausewho discovers a cure for cancer indicates which scientist will be immortalized, orThe mathematician over there, who solved the four-color theorem, is widely known, where the clausewho solved the four-color theorem adds information about a person already identified by the phrase the mathematician over there. ? Some grammarians have argued that onlywho and not that should be used to introduce a restrictive relative clause that identifies a person. This restriction has no basis either in logic or in the usage of the best writers;it is entirely acceptable to write eitherthe man that wanted to talk to you or the man who wanted to talk to you. ? The grammatical rules governing the use ofwho and whom apply equally to whoever and whomever. See Usage Note at else ,that ,whose 。

确定用法的传统规则who 和 whom 相对简单： who 语法上用作主语，同 I 或 he 等主格代词的位置相同， 而whom 用于别处。 这样，我们写The actor who played Hamlet was there （演哈姆雷特的演员在那边）， 因此who 代表的是 played Hamlet 的主语。 在句子Who do you think is the best candidate? （你认为谁是最好的候选人?）中 who 代表 is the best candidate 的主语。 但是我们说To whom did you give the letter? （你把信给谁了?）， 因为whom 是介词 to 的宾语； 在句子The man whom the papers criticized did not show up, （报纸上批评的那个人没有来）， 因为whom 是动词 criticized 的宾语 。在复杂的句子里，正确应用这些规则需要相当的努力和注意。正确地造出如I met the man whom the government had tried to get France to extradite （我遇到了政府曾努力让法国引渡的那个人）这样的句子， 在写whom 之前我们必须预知它将作动词 extradite 的宾语， 尽管两个词离得很远。这也就难怪自莎士比亚以来的作家经常把who 和 whom 交换使用了。 尽管在正式文体中两者区别仍然存在，但如果在非正式的交谈中严格地遵守这些规则会被认为说话者或作者可能不顾内容而过分注视说话的形式。在口语和非正式书面语中，who 趋向于代替 whom; 人们会认为象Who did John say he was going to support? （约翰说他将支持谁?）这样句子很自然，尽管严格来说它是不正确的。 相反，在应该用who 的地方用 whom 则显出一种语言上的不稳定， 如Whom shall I say is calling? （我说是谁在打电话?）。 当关系代词替代句尾的介词宾语时，whom 在理论上是正确的形势： 严格的语法坚持Whom （而不是 who ) did you give it to?（你把它给谁了？） 但从诺·韦伯斯特以来的语法学家认为whom 在这种情况下过分正式，而把介词放在句尾相对来说又不正式，这就有了矛盾，所以在这种情况下用 who 完全可以接受。 关系代词who 可以用在限定关系从句中，前面不要加逗号， 也可用在非限定关系从句中，则需要加逗号。所以我们既可以说The scientist who discovers a cure for cancer will be immortalized （发现治愈癌症的方法的科学家将会因此而不朽）， 在此处从句who discovers a cure for cancer 指这样的科学家将会不朽， 也可以说The mathematician over there, who solved the four-color theorem, is widely known （在那边的数学家非常出名，他解决了四色定理）， 从句who solved the four-color theorem 给已经由短语 the mathematician over there 确定了的人增加了一些有关他的信息。 有些语法学家认为只有who 而不是 that 可以连接表示人的限定性关系从句。 这种限制在逻辑上没有根据，在最优秀作家的用法中也未有根据；无论说the man that wanted to talk to you （想要跟你说话的那个人）或 the man who wanted to talk to you 都是完全可以接受的。 有关who 和 whom 的语法规则同样适用于 whoever 和 whomever 参见 else,that,whose。

WHO

WHO

abbr.（略语）

World Health Organization.。

世界卫生组织

who

[hu:]

pron.

(宾格whom; 所有格whose)。

[疑问代词]谁; 哪位

[连接代词]谁

[限制性的关系代词]...的人。

[非限制性的关系代词]他[她]; 他[她]们。

[古][省略先行词的关系代词]...的人。

W-is that?

那是谁?

He is a man who is of value to the people.。

他是一个有益于人民的人。

Whom did you see?。

你看见谁了?

That's the man who came to our house yesterday.。

那就是昨天到过我们家来的人。

My cousin, who is a painter, is in Japan at present.。

我的表哥是画家, 他现在在日本。

Who breaks pays.。

损坏者要赔。

who

n.

有关人物 the who and the why of it 与该事有关的人物及其发生的原因。

who iswho(=who's who)。

知道某一范围内所有的人是谁(It took the new teacher a few days to remember who was who in the class. 这位新教师花了几天时间记住班上学生的名字)。

名[要]人, 有影响人士

Who's Who

名人录, 名人词典

WHO

=White House Office 白宫办公厅[美];。

World Health Organization 世界卫生组织。

who

who

AHD:[h›]

D.J.[hu8]

K.K.[hu]

pron.

What or which person or persons:。

Who left?

Used as a relative pronoun to introduce a clause when the antecedent is a person or persons or one to whom personality is attributed:。

the visitor who came yesterday; our child, who is gifted; informed sources who denied the story.。

The person or persons that; whoever:。

Who believes that will believe anything.。

Middle English 。

from Old English hw³} * see k wo- 。

The traditional rules that determine the use ofwho and whom are relatively simple: who is used for a grammatical subject, where a nominative pronoun such as I or he would be appropriate, andwhom is used elsewhere. Thus, we writeThe actor who played Hamlet was there, sincewho stands for the subject of played Hamlet; andWho do you think is the best candidate? where who stands for the subject of is the best candidate. But we writeTo whom did you give the letter? sincewhom is the object of the preposition to; andThe man whom the papers criticized did not show up, sincewhom is the object of the verb criticized. ? Considerable effort and attention are required to apply the rules correctly in complicated sentences.To produce correctly a sentence such asI met the man whom the government had tried to get France to extradite, we must anticipate when we writewhom that it will function as the object of the verb extradite, several clauses distant from it.It is thus not surprising that writers from Shakespeare onward should often have interchangedwho and whom. And though the distinction shows no signs of disappearing in formal style,strict adherence to the rules in informal discourse might be taken as evidence that the speaker or writer is paying undue attention to the form of what is said, possibly at the expense of its substance.In speech and informal writingwho tends to predominate over whom; a sentence such asWho did John say he was going to support? will be regarded as quite natural, if strictly incorrect. By contrast, the use ofwhom where who would be required, as inWhom shall I say is calling? may be thought to betray a certain linguistic insecurity. ? When the relative pronoun stands for the object of a preposition that ends a sentence,whom is technically the correct form: the strict grammarian will insist onWhom (not who ) did you give it to? But grammarians since Noah Webster have argued that the excessive formality ofwhom in these cases is at odds with the relative informality associated with the practice of placing the preposition in final position and that the use of who in these cases should be regarded as entirely acceptable. ? The relative pronounwho may be used in restrictive relative clauses, in which case it is not preceded by a comma, or in nonrestrictive clauses, in which case a comma is required.Thus, we may say eitherThe scientist who discovers a cure for cancer will be immortalized, where the clausewho discovers a cure for cancer indicates which scientist will be immortalized, orThe mathematician over there, who solved the four-color theorem, is widely known, where the clausewho solved the four-color theorem adds information about a person already identified by the phrase the mathematician over there. ? Some grammarians have argued that onlywho and not that should be used to introduce a restrictive relative clause that identifies a person. This restriction has no basis either in logic or in the usage of the best writers;it is entirely acceptable to write eitherthe man that wanted to talk to you or the man who wanted to talk to you. ? The grammatical rules governing the use ofwho and whom apply equally to whoever and whomever. See Usage Note at else ,that ,whose 。

WHO

WHO

abbr.

World Health Organization.。

各国送礼大观

Do’s and Taboos of Gift Giving。

● America

美国

An American woman living in Wisconsin volunteered to tutor1 English to a Japanese woman who had moved into the same community. “Before each lesson, and on each and every visit,” the American reported, “the Japanese lady brought me a gift — a book, some paper sculpture, flowers, or candy. It was embarrassing.”

一位居住在威斯康星州的美国女士自告奋勇辅导刚搬进同一社区的一位日本女士学习英语。她指出：“那位日本妇女每次上课、每次拜访都带礼物给我，一本书、纸刻品、花或是糖果，真令我尴尬。”

Unknowingly, this American was experiencing a vestige of protocol rooted centuries deep in the Japanese culture. 。

这位美国女士不知不觉领教了日本几百年来根深蒂固的文化传统。

In America, lavish2, extravagant3 gifts are definitely out. An appropriate alternate to a gift is to take the deserving person to dinner, or to an entertainment or sporting event. On the contrary, gift giving is an institution and a revered custom in Japan. According to Business Tokyo magazine, among the Japanese “gift giving is a necessity, not merely a nicety as in the West.” In Japan the proper gift is thought to express the giver’s true friendship, gratitude, and respect far better than words can. So if you plan to visit Japan or to have Japanese visit you here, be prepared.。

在美国，赠送贵重的礼物是行不通的，比较合适的礼物是带上你要感谢的朋友去赴宴或参加娱乐体育活动。与之相反的是，在日本送礼是一种制度，一个优良惯例。据《东京商业杂志》所言，“日本人送礼至关重要，而不像西方仅把它当作一件不起眼的事。”在日本，恰当的礼物意为表达送礼之人诚挚的难以言表的友好、感激及尊重之情，所以如果你准备前往日本或有日本朋友前来拜访，一定要做好准备。

So you know gift giving plays a very important role in nowadays society. Now let’s see what’s happened in other countries.。

你看，当今社会，送礼发挥着重要作用。现在我们来看看其他国家的情况。

● Germany

德国

A West Virginia executive, visiting Germany for the first time, was invited to the home of his largest customer. He decided to be gallant4 and bring his hostess a bouquet of flowers. He selected a dozen red roses.。

一位西弗吉尼亚主管第一次去德国，其最大的客户邀请他上门拜访。他想献殷勤，于是给女主人带了一束鲜花，选的是一打红玫瑰。

Oops! Terrible mistake! Social gift giving is popular and well-established in Germany but has certain do’s and don’ts.。

噢！这个错可犯大了！交际中送礼在德国早已司空见惯，为世人所接受。不过什么可送什么不可送可是大有学问的。 乐学网奉献。

Flowers are often taken to a hostess of a dinner party at her home, but there are three taboos to remember: 1)red roses signify a romantic interest, 2)an even5 number of flowers signifies bad luck, as does the number thirteen, and 3)always unwrap the flowers before presenting them. This West Virginia was making what amounted to a pass at his customer’s wife.。

如果晚宴设在女主人家中，常见的就是给她送花。不过有三个禁忌一定得记住：1）红玫瑰象征着心仪对方；2）偶数鲜花寓意着倒霉，13朵也是如此；3）献花之前不要包扎。这个西弗吉尼亚人送红玫瑰让人以为他对客户的妻子有意思呢！

When visiting a German home, gifts that reflect your home country are popular, and you might want to bring small gifts for the children of the family you are visiting.。

登门拜访德国人时，带上能反映你祖国特色的礼物将大受欢迎！也可以给主人家的孩子带上点小礼物。 转自szdmz.com。

Gifts are customarily6 wrapped and many Germans spend considerable time designing elegant wrappings. Most shops offer gift-wrapping services, too.。

礼物一般得包扎，很多德国人会花上一定的时间设计个优雅的包装。大多数商店也会提供包装服务。

● Greece

希腊

The most common form of showing appreciation in Greece is probably an evening’s entertainment. If you do present a gift, avoid personal items, such as ties and shirts. If you are invited to a Greek home, flowers or a cake for the hostess are an appropriate gift.。

在希腊，表达感激之情最常见的方式可能就是晚间娱乐活动。如果你要送礼，不要送一些过于亲昵的东西，比如领带衬衣之类。如果希腊人邀请你去其家做客，给女主人送上鲜花或者蛋糕就很合适了。 szdmz.com整理。

● Italy

意大利

When you are invited to a person’s home for dinner, it might be nice to bring flowers or a box of chocolates for your hostess, although it is just as considerate to have the flowers sent the next day.。

Yellow roses can signify “jealousy.” And in Italy never send chrysanthemums7, since they suggest death. 。

当你受邀至某户人家共进晚餐时，为女主人带上几束花或者一盒巧克力就可以啦，不过当然你要是第二天再送花的话，也可算是考虑周到了。

黄玫瑰寓意着“嫉妒”。在意大利人们从来不送菊花，因为这暗示死亡。

● Australia

澳大利亚

来源：szdmz.com

Australia is known for its friendly informality and lack of pretentiousness8. So modest gifts, such as a business diary, a paperweight, or a coffee mug might be presented as a memento9 of a visit of business meeting. At a trade show, T-shirts, ties, baseball caps, or a pin may be appropriate mementos. Anything more than these types of gifts could cause embarrassment. 。

澳大利亚以其友好，不拘礼节及坦诚而闻名，所以在参加商务会议时，送上一个商用记事本、纸镇或一个咖啡杯再合适不过了。在商业展览上，赠送T恤衫、领带、棒球帽或者一个大头针最合适做纪念品了。若送比这些东西贵重的礼品反而会致人尴尬。

原文地址：http://www.qianchusai.com/informality%E7%94%A8%E6%B3%95.html